Pattison and Decker

Skiing and mountain literature, photos, and innovative media
Post Reply
naomig
naomig

Pattison and Decker

Post by naomig »

I am soooooooooo excited to have found a new female adventure buddy as awesome as Maddy. Last week we skied inbounds on both Blackcomb and Whistler with my proposed agenda of skiing only double black diamond runs with as many gnarly couloirs as possible. Maddy was a superstar. Not only is her skiing improving still, but she kept her shit together through all nerve racking situations and even went first to drop into a couloir which I was scared to do. I followed with joy having found someone that can push me as well :) OMG SUPER STOKE!

On Friday I was, needless to say, very excited to go out with her again and this time in the backcountry. We picked a day with great avi stability but were unsure whether the snow would be nice to ski on. Maddy and I decided to assess our plans as we went. Our first plan was to hit Pattison. We were surprised to find skiing pleasant on both S aspects on the way and the N aspect of Pattison with only a few pockets of thin wind slabs.

Maddy skiing down the backside of the Spearhead on our way to Pattison.
Image

Pattison on our approach. We skied the wide couloir on the right.
Image

Being the first one to drop into a steeper face like on Pattison out in the backcountry was a thrilling experience for me.
Image

We had some flat light at times and the clouds rolling in made me nervous. But there was nothing to be worried about. We had plenty of day light left and the clouds were high in the sky with occasional breaks, so we headed to Decker next.

Maddy making turns coming down Pattison in flat light.
Image

The huge cornices along Decker kept us on edge as we were trying to find a way down the N/NW face. We eventually found the Finger Shoots which were easy to drop into and still was steep skiing. Maddy about to drop in with Whistler in the back.
Image

Maddy in the Finger Shoots. The snow was definitely more compact going down here, but nothing worse than the stuff we skied inbounds the previous week.
Image

After this the ski out should've been a tree traverse to the pistes of Blackcomb to Seventh Heaven chair. We ended up too low and encountered bullshit steep tight tree traversing. It took us an hour before we said "fuck this shit", put our skins back on and found ourselves at the cat track after only a short while of going vertical instead of traversing. We realised that we had probably been traversing about 20 m below the cat track for a couple km at this point.

It was a true adventure day; we both had our freakout moments, encountered some bullshit skiing and finished the day in the dark. I had soooooooo much fun on soooooooo many different levels touring with Maddy. The most memorable experience was that this was team work where we made collaborative decisions and took turns leading. I'm used to following Sky who has all the ideas and assesses the situations - which by no means I'm complaining about since I get to ski RAD shit. Again I have to mention how stoked I am to have found a partner exactly at my level with the same attitude for pushing our boundaries.

I AM STOKED! THANKS MADDY!
Last edited by naomig on Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
skykilo
olikyks
from Santa Fe
Contact:

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by skykilo »

Yah for the gurlz! I'm happy for you. And scared.

Topologically, I don't understand how you could ski either Whistler or Blackcomb and ski nothing but double black diamond runs.

Maddy

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by Maddy »

haha thanks Naomi. There is a lot of stoke going on over here on my end as well!

naomig
naomig

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by naomig »

Ok, so to be explicit about the inbounds day: we had one warm up groomer run at the beginning and then did only runs that contained double black diamond sections. I couldn't be bothered writing all of that the first time.

ryanl

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by ryanl »

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

Way to go ladies!

Alex

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by Alex »

Nice one girls!
I'm also scared... scared that Maddy might be able to ski better than me in a couple months.

E_$
imminent whippage

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by E_$ »

Sounds like an awesome tour ladies! SUPER STOKE indeed.

ryanl

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by ryanl »

Alex wrote:Nice one girls!
I'm also scared... scared that Maddy might be able to ski better than me in a couple months.
Scared?! Dude, take some advice from someone very familiar with said fear: be STOKED!

daveb
daveb

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by daveb »

Yeah! I was thinking about that area just yesterday...and the day before...and...well, you get the idea.

ziff

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by ziff »

nice tour naomi and maddy! thanks for the TR

alex, seriously, that boys school you went to has gone to yer head! what did they teach you there :-)

Alex

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by Alex »

Must have been that Geography class I took...
I was expecting sarcastic tele comments like, "she already skis better than you, you tele-whacker"

This TR does have the most stoke out of anything that's come out of the coast mountains in a while. It might be because Naomi's excitement carries through in her writing.

ziff

Re: Pattison and Decker

Post by ziff »

Alex, I must admit, the thought did come to my mind :-)

Post Reply